![]() Configure IntelliSense for cross-compilingĮdit Visual Studio Code on Linux Installation.Again, the only difference - you don't need to add it by yourself. The default apt/sources.list of LMDE differs from original Debian's (except adding LMDE's repo and Debian's backports) by adding contrib and non-free sections of the same repos available from the Debian project. ![]() But, unlike Debian, you don't need to spend hours before "oh, ok, I can fit with it" feeling - it goes "out of the box," just like with the original Mint.Īnd non-free software. With it, you can finally get what's best for you. LMDE now looks for me as an ideal compromise. ![]() Now Debian looks like "tweak something here, and move something there - and you'll get your perfect system." Mint has got almost no time to get ready but isn't so perfect. And I have something to say - as a former Debian user and current Mint user.Īfter Debian, Mint looked more "ready to use." Install it, mounting your previous home partition - and you're aboard. Now I want to switch back (for many reasons, including stupid Ubuntu's decision to move chromium to snap I dislike depending on untrusted software, and Mint doesn't provide a suitable solution). I'd been using Debian for years, and a couple of years ago, I switched to Mint. As Bullseye is not package frozen yet it can still be sorted out in time. Eventually clem will have to update Linux Mint in the same manner anyway. From what I read it has already been dealt with but the Debian maintainer is yet to completely figure out what LeighLinux did to fix it for Fedora and apply the same to Debian Bullseye. That's what led me to LMDE4 to begin with as I'm too lazy to faff with sourcing firmware packages to add during install these there's another thread about the Cinnamon compile issue. There's a nonfree community ISO but even that didn't contain everything my computers needed either. True but importantly the Debian ISO does not contain firmware-brandormodelgoeshere files either. Please be aware that LMDE4 contains the non-free kernel modules that are essential to most of us like wireless, ethernet, and certain GPU driversĪll kernel modules come from the Debian repository but yes firmware-linux-nonfree is installed on LMDE 4 by default and not on Debian. This is pragmatism: Linux Mint prefer free software and as said publishes all software it develops as free software but Linux Mint user want to be able to easily install Dropbox or Spotify clients thus these are available from the repository though these are non-free. That said, there are a couple of non-free programs in the the LMDE repository. The Linux kernel and other OS components of LMDE all come from the Debian package base repository so adhere to Debian's policies. All software developed by Linux Mint is published under the GPL. You can browse the LMDE repository contents here. Besides getting new releases of Cinnamon and Nemo which Debian stable doesn't, you also get new releases of other Linux Mint developed software such as Software Manager, Update Manager, Xed text editor, Pix image viewer and all the rest that make LMDE. LMDE is basically Debian stable repository + LMDE repository, different default software selection, different default configurations and different themes and appeareance. What differentiates Debian and LMDE other than the DE?ĭoes LMDE still adhere to the FOSS policy of Debian or does it include any proprietary software or binary blobs? Is LMDE basically Debian with a cleaned up DE? No offence to the LMDE developers, but I am not sure what the difference is. I know how to install PPAs with debian and I am fine with that. ![]() By that I mean: you cannot do PPA: some link. I mainly use the terminal for most of my work nowadays, and I completely aware that I can not use the Ubuntu PPAs easily with Debian. Note: While I was a complete noob a year ago, I am quite comfortable with Linux now. Can I upgrade LMDE easily to the next version, or would it require a fresh install?.May I just use apt upgrade just like in Debian for updates?.While I know the package manger of LMDE is Debian rather than Ubuntu, is the update manager maintained by Mint or Debian?.Does LMDE still adhere to the FOSS policy of Debian or does it include any proprietary software or binary blobs?.What differentiates Debian and LMDE other than the DE?.Is LMDE basically Debian with a cleaned up DE? No offence to the LMDE developers, but I am not sure what the difference is.I am not clear what the difference between LMDE and Debian Cinnamon would be. However, I am getting a new desktop, and I am debating which Debian based OS I want to install. I am quite happy with it, especially the desktop environment. I have been using Linux Mint Cinnamon for a year and a half now. I posted this in the wrong topic previously. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |